Linda Francis/ Invoke scientific content, yes, but produce content not necessarily unless we ask the same questions of both disciplines, “what is reality” notwithstanding. If we focus on one specific question maybe, and then agree to discuss each discipline’s findings in relation to the other. That might work. Perhaps a more narrow version of consilience, as Taney cited in the last session. Thinking about what Dan began in a reply to Werner regarding discursion reminds me of a particularly interesting conceit in art that is labeled “recursion”: In one sense, artists are creating works that have to prove themselves as objects or facts. Enter recursivity- discursively speaking, our own Mandelbrot-ian referents. Apropos of that, fractals have been able to describe Russian nesting dolls and molecular biology.